Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 556
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Metrics Today from FreeDC Stats
Top User: Esteban69 - 19,524 Users Returning Work: 101/250 (34.83%) Points per user yesterday: 1982 We only had 101 members returning results yesterday Just look at the awesome result though, 198,120 points Now that is what I call dedication to the Team and WCG Movers of the Day ( Well Done Everyone ) Million Point Man ^6 farhan769 ^4 Jerblock ^3 - neclord ^3 - Neumonic ^3 - Animos ^3 - sm217144 ^3 Martle ^2 - InkTaylor ^2 - Bon Kuhlman ^2 - m4dbra1n ^2 Graham ^1 - jwilson15304 ^1 - John Parker ^1 - Andrew R ^1 - jemc2000 ^1 - Verheagh ^1 Kevin Deslauriers ^1 - amusic20 ^1 - shortTom007 *1 |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
![]() ![]() |
||
|
MLCBA
Senior Cruncher Joined: Nov 30, 2004 Post Count: 225 Status: Offline |
![]() ![]() Good one Graham. ![]() Keep them coming. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hmmm, I now have 25 awaiting validation... when are the points credited? On the day of validation or the day of crunching? I still seem to be doing about 6K points per day though which isn't bad... Paul ![]() Currently WCG are sending out 3 WU's to 3 different users under BOINC Your points are credited, as soon as the 3rd WU is received and validated, providing the first two are valid In my experience, if the third WU is not returned within 96 hours of the first three being sent out, then a 4th WU will be sent out in an effort to complete the quorum and validate your work I think that the introduction of reducing the WU's required to 3 to get a valid result will create a larger backlog of pending validations than we were used to under the old system of sending out 4 WU's ![]() Thanks Graham, I guess crunchers with fast machines are going to build a backlog of results equivalent to the difference in speed of their machine vs the average speed of the slowest crunchers... I can see a maths question coming on... If cruncher A calculates 8 WUs a day and cruncher B calculates 1 WU a day when will knreed(?) get fed up with the number of complaints about non allocation of points and start sending out 4WUs again... ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() He has had an exceptional month of crunching He's contributed 43,411 Points in 28 days That is an average of 1550 points per day He's only 8 days away from a 100k Certificate |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Thanks Graham, I guess crunchers with fast machines are going to build a backlog of results equivalent to the difference in speed of their machine vs the average speed of the slowest crunchers... I can see a maths question coming on... If cruncher A calculates 8 WUs a day and cruncher B calculates 1 WU a day when will knreed(?) get fed up with the number of complaints about non allocation of points and start sending out 4WUs again... ![]() ![]() I imagine that a great number of BOINC Users are going to get impatient with the change They may take the stance that as a volunteer they have done their part and therefore should not be made to wait unnecessarily to get their work validated Before the change I usually had around 12 to 14 WU's pending validation at any given time I now have a backlog of 30 WU's awaiting validation and I can see the backlog continuing to rise The fact that a lot of members download additional work units out of paranoia, unnecessarily, as they are afraid that they may run out of work, just has the effect of compounding the situation even further In my humble opinion, points are still the most compelling reason to continue volunteering one's PC's to this very worthy cause, as they represent an accurate measure of a members efforts regarding his contribution I helieve that increasing the waiting time of points validation will have an adverse effect In the last 18 months I have never read a post from a member complaining about losing a work unit It has always been a complaint about points not being credited for work believed to have been returned [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at May 23, 2006 10:39:32 PM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
![]() ![]() Good one Graham. ![]() Keep them coming. Slow down..I can't keep up with your typing.lol ![]() Excellent job Graham!!!!! |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() He has had an exceptional month of crunching He's contributed 43,411 Points in 28 days That is an average of 1550 points per day He's only 8 days away from a 100k Certificate ![]() ![]() Keep up the good work!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
WELCOME BACK DAVE!!!!!!!!
WELCOME BACK!!!!!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
...............................................................................................
.............................. Date....................Runtime...................Daily Points.......Daily Results.........Place 05/23/2006..... 0:292:05:12:37.......... 215,931................ 844................. #11 05/22/2006..... 0:284:09:32:40.......... 200,068................ 724................. #12 05/21/2006..... 0:270:03:59:05.......... 198,120................ 648................. #11 ............................................................................................... .............................. ![]() (Stats-Image Generator by WCG Member Börni) |
||
|
|
![]() |