Gosh, that was 2002. Got any new science to offer? And thanks for confirming it is a greenhouse gas... Did you miss the part about nutritional value? You'll be needing a half loaf in a few decades to get out what before was provided by a few slices. More acres of land needed to grow food... cut down more forest.

Sometime Sek you make me laugh

There are some area's of the Sea that have little flow and are shallow and are in warm regions of the globe and as a consequence show anoxic effects which it is true are not helped by our farming methods

One such area being right in the fold of the Adriatic sea up near Venice

But to extrapolate this to "Oceanic Death" is a bit rich

Even the graphs you propose show how much Sea Ice has disappeared clearly show how much has come back so far.

The Sea Ice finds itself within our envelope of experience...just over 30 years.

There are climatic cycles that last as long as that and also on much much longer timescales.

Let's be rational about what we know and what we don't know

Dave

FYI http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/28222

We stare through a very narrow slit in time

I wasn't being serious just making a point, (One can't keep the bag on anyway unless sedated; the body knows it is asphyxiating from oxygen being displaced by CO2). It is not always so harmless.

S.O.B.

?

sorry Sek one guy had just told me to try putting a plastic bag on my head so another calling me a ..... is hardly unusual in this debate

The algal blooms are a normal event. It appears the Baltic blooms are exacerbated by over fishing. The algal bloom would normally be food for the fish. Things have improved since 2005. As we know 2005 was the peak of the rise in Global Temperature and Solar activity.

The Baltic is another of those shallow Seas within a fold of land. The Gulf of Mexico the same. It does not mean Oceanic Death