Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 121
Posts: 121   Pages: 13   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 582979 times and has 120 replies Next Thread
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

The reliable host rule is < 4 days return time (per my last information). Soon as you have tasks going over, you're out for that device.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Mar 5, 2010 4:06:31 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

Sek, the first group, erlc type A followed that rule but i think the deadline was about 5 days for the 'resends' to reliable hosts. The new rules for the next set are 7 days to reliable.

-Uplinger
[Mar 5, 2010 4:13:17 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
jasm580
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: Dec 20, 2007
Post Count: 157
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

The reliable host rule is < 4 days return time (per my last information). Soon as you have tasks going over, you're out for that device.

I think this would have been more fun. biggrin Anyone that snagged 2 or more units out of the gate would probably be labled unreliable by the time they were completed and would not get any more type As for a while.
----------------------------------------
-Jasm
[Mar 5, 2010 4:17:06 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

Assuming then the automation turns any resends into having deadlines of 2.8 days (40%). I noticed 5.6 days on the A type repairs (in a post someone snagging one I was waiting for).
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Mar 5, 2010 4:17:37 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
pball1224
Cruncher
USA
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
Post Count: 45
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

First I'd like to state, I don't understand why people set their cache so high, unless they go long periods without internet connectivity.

If the 15 valid result, and 4 day return criteria are still in effect to qualify as a reliable client, it sounds like even if your client is a 24/7 cruncher with a cache of more than a a few days, it might cause you to get bumped from the reliable list.

For example: Your cache is set to 3 days of work. The WU's are estimated to take like what, 40 hours? So your client downloads 2 of them. Then if the first actually takes 50 hours, and the second takes more than 46 hours to finish, it will be beyond 4 days from when it was sent to you, bumping you from the reliable list. (this example is for a single core obviously)
[Mar 5, 2010 4:32:55 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

You got it exactly right. Deduct the longest possible WCG job from the maximum 'reliable' return period and you have an approximate cache size maximum, bar poor TTC projections. So if wanting the A Types and wanting to continue running A types, and previously the device did them in 46 hours, the cache size limit becomes about 2 days. If on line and having reliable internet connection 0.3 to 1.0 days more than suffices.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Mar 5, 2010 4:40:03 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
GIBA
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Apr 25, 2005
Post Count: 5374
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

You got it exactly right. Deduct the longest possible WCG job from the maximum 'reliable' return period and you have an approximate cache size maximum, bar poor TTC projections. So if wanting the A Types and wanting to continue running A types, and previously the device did them in 46 hours, the cache size limit becomes about 2 days. If on line and having reliable internet connection 0.3 to 1.0 days more than suffices.


So, with my 24-26 hours averages, I got a shoot on the foot ...

If you are right I will just get at most 1 day of cache work, maybe 2 days. man... shock thinking coffee
----------------------------------------
Cheers ! GIB@ peace coffee
Join BRASIL - BRAZIL@GRID team and be very happy !
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=DF99KT5DN1

[Mar 5, 2010 5:12:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Nov 8, 2004
Post Count: 4504
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

Assuming then the automation turns any resends into having deadlines of 2.8 days (40%). I noticed 5.6 days on the A type repairs (in a post someone snagging one I was waiting for).


Here is what we changed things to yesterday:

We are setting the deadline for the Type A workunits to 20 days. However, we are loading the workunits so that all copies are sent to reliable machines immediately (not waiting for only the resends to be sent to the reliable machines). This causes the 40% factor to take effect and the deadline for a specific result is reduced to 8 days (more if the server determines that the computer will need a little more time).

For the type B, we will set the priority so that they get loaded and sent before any type C workunits but they will still be sent to any machine. The deadline for these workunits will be 7 days. Re-sends will then be set to 40% of 7 days = 2.8 days.

Type C will be set to normal priority and have the standard 10 day deadline and re-sends will have the 4 day deadline.
[Mar 5, 2010 5:50:26 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
GIBA
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Apr 25, 2005
Post Count: 5374
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

Received two same messages from WCG server about DDDT2 project at sametime, and it continues in each conections interval... is it normal ?

Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 37850 seconds of work, reporting 2 completed tasks
Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 tasks
Message from server: No work sent
Message from server: No work is available for Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together - Phase 2
Message from server: No work is available for Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together - Phase 2
Message from server: No work is available for the applications you have selected. Please check your settings on the website.


thinking coffee
----------------------------------------
Cheers ! GIB@ peace coffee
Join BRASIL - BRAZIL@GRID team and be very happy !
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=DF99KT5DN1

[Mar 5, 2010 11:40:47 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

Since A and B and C are having different deadlines I suspect there being 3 feeds that also caters for testing if a device is eligible for A or B or C.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Mar 5, 2010 11:46:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 121   Pages: 13   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread