Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 121
Posts: 121   Pages: 13   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 582842 times and has 120 replies Next Thread
GIBA
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Apr 25, 2005
Post Count: 5374
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

Since A and B and C are having different deadlines I suspect there being 3 feeds that also caters for testing if a device is eligible for A or B or C.


Interesting. coffee
----------------------------------------
Cheers ! GIB@ peace coffee
Join BRASIL - BRAZIL@GRID team and be very happy !
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=DF99KT5DN1

[Mar 5, 2010 11:52:01 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Ingleside
Veteran Cruncher
Norway
Joined: Nov 19, 2005
Post Count: 974
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

Since A and B and C are having different deadlines I suspect there being 3 feeds that also caters for testing if a device is eligible for A or B or C.

It's unlikely variable deadlines has anything to do with this, since if this was the case you could get 10+ similar messages in other BOINC-projects...

But DDDT2 uses 2 different app_id, and with multiple applications with no available work you'll get the message once for each applicatiion.

If C-type will add a 3rd. app_id I've no idea...
----------------------------------------


"I make so many mistakes. But then just think of all the mistakes I don't make, although I might."
[Mar 6, 2010 3:14:11 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

Yes, there are currently 2 applications for DDDT-2. This is why two different messages. We have one for type A work units, since they are large and unique. B and C use the same.

-Uplinger
[Mar 6, 2010 3:30:06 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

OK, the app is the difference, there being a difference. Can the message be adapted to say, "No A", "No B/C"?
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Mar 6, 2010 8:14:28 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
X-Files 27
Senior Cruncher
Canada
Joined: May 21, 2007
Post Count: 391
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

There's another thing I notice in BOINC, "Average turnaround time". We can add this creteria for #1. For sure, with this added, we can fast track the type c's.

edit:
taken from here.
<reliable_max_avg_turnaround>secs</reliable_max_avg_turnaround>
snip...
NOTE: this mechanism can be used to preferentially send ANY job, not just retries, to fast/reliable hosts. To do so, set the workunit's priority to reliable_on_priority or greater.

----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by X-Files 27 at Mar 8, 2010 1:53:28 AM]
[Mar 8, 2010 1:41:02 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Nov 8, 2004
Post Count: 4504
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

OK, the app is the difference, there being a difference. Can the message be adapted to say, "No A", "No B/C"?


The name of the project included in the message is the name of the project (i.e. it will show up in the task list and elsewhere). I have altered the name of the projects to be:

Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together - Phase 2
Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together - Phase 2 (Type A)

Type A are now clearly identified and the one not clearly labeled will be for the B and C type workunits
[Mar 8, 2010 1:44:53 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Nov 8, 2004
Post Count: 4504
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

There's another thing I notice in BOINC, "Average turnaround time". We can add this creteria for #1. For sure, with this added, we can fast track the type c's.

edit:
taken from here.
<reliable_max_avg_turnaround>secs</reliable_max_avg_turnaround>
snip...
NOTE: this mechanism can be used to preferentially send ANY job, not just retries, to fast/reliable hosts. To do so, set the workunit's priority to reliable_on_priority or greater.



We are already ready using that feature (which we contributed).

Type A workunits have a base priority of 10 and sent only to reliable hosts (the cut of on priority for reliable hosts is 10 for WCG). They have a deadline of 20 days but since they are being sent to reliable hosts the deadline is 40% of the original value so it is sent as 8 days.

Type B workunits have a base priority of 1 which means they will be distributed ahead of Type C workunits. They have a 7 day deadline (resends will have a 2.8 day deadline).

Type C workunits have a base priority of 0. They have a 10 day deadline (resends will have a 4 day deadline).

Our config.xml settings that are relevant to the reliable feature are:

<reliable_max_error_rate>0.002</reliable_max_error_rate>
<reliable_max_avg_turnaround>172800</reliable_max_avg_turnaround>
<reliable_reduced_delay_bound>0.4</reliable_reduced_delay_bound>
<reliable_on_priority>10</reliable_on_priority>
<reliable_priority_on_over>10</reliable_priority_on_over>
[Mar 8, 2010 1:50:05 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
gb009761
Master Cruncher
Scotland
Joined: Apr 6, 2005
Post Count: 2982
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

OK, the app is the difference, there being a difference. Can the message be adapted to say, "No A", "No B/C"?


The name of the project included in the message is the name of the project (i.e. it will show up in the task list and elsewhere). I have altered the name of the projects to be:

Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together - Phase 2
Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together - Phase 2 (Type A)

Type A are now clearly identified and the one not clearly labeled will be for the B and C type workunits


Hi Kevin, thanks for that - it certainly makes things a little clearer.

If my understanding is correct, does this mean that the B/C 'pot' is checked first, before the 'A' types? If so, I'm a little surprised, as, due to the trickle effect, I'd have thought that it would have been more urgent to distribute the A's (to the reliable hosts) first, before the B's and C's.

Edit: Actually, if I remember reading somewhere, I think the "Resend queue" (which of course, these "A"'s will be), is checked first, then the Beta WU queue (neither of which, would display a message if empty), then the normal queues. Thus, in this scenario, the A's would get distributed before the B/C types.
----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by gb009761 at Mar 8, 2010 2:30:29 PM]
[Mar 8, 2010 2:02:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
X-Files 27
Senior Cruncher
Canada
Joined: May 21, 2007
Post Count: 391
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

thanks knreed, its good to know this stuff.
----------------------------------------

[Mar 8, 2010 2:04:44 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
GIBA
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Apr 25, 2005
Post Count: 5374
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT-2 Work Unit distribution updated

OK, the app is the difference, there being a difference. Can the message be adapted to say, "No A", "No B/C"?


The name of the project included in the message is the name of the project (i.e. it will show up in the task list and elsewhere). I have altered the name of the projects to be:

Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together - Phase 2
Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together - Phase 2 (Type A)

Type A are now clearly identified and the one not clearly labeled will be for the B and C type workunits


Thank you. coffee
----------------------------------------
Cheers ! GIB@ peace coffee
Join BRASIL - BRAZIL@GRID team and be very happy !
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=DF99KT5DN1

[Mar 8, 2010 3:54:58 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 121   Pages: 13   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread