| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Human Proteome Folding - Phase 2
Thread: New error type? |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 62
|
|
| Author |
|
|
JSYKES
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 200 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I have spotted a new error type (well new to me) only had two so far, spaced a few days apart and on different machines (but same OS, processor etc), both running latest 6.2.28 and same error text, as below:
----------------------------------------<core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version> < |
||
|
|
wplachy
Senior Cruncher Joined: Sep 4, 2007 Post Count: 423 Status: Offline |
I've had 12 HPF2 WUs error over the last 11 days that ran from 0.01 to 0.53 CPU hrs all with the exact same error code and exit line nbr.
----------------------------------------I haven't saved anything to check further back but I believe this is what I've seen on almost all HPF2 error WUs I've had Bill P Edit typos 
Bill P
---------------------------------------- [Edit 3 times, last edit by wplachy at Jun 4, 2010 8:17:43 PM] |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
/711 seems to have come in place of /401, except they show 90% less than latter. So far have an absolute 100% validation score on W7-32 bit on duo and Linux 64 bit with 6.10 64 bit client on quad in any imaginable WCG science combination. Running HPF2 in combo with HFCC & FAAH on W7-64 quad did give errors for a considerable fail percent, but none with HCC/RICE/HCMD2.
----------------------------------------
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Jun 4, 2010 8:41:58 PM] |
||
|
|
JSYKES
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 200 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Thanks Sek - running W7 -64 on both of the i7 boxes these WU's errored on....haven't had a single error on any other WU's for a couple of months - certainly since starting to use the latest agent upgrade, until these two units came along. I just thought it might be worth asking to see if it was only my machines or if there is a more common thread elsewhere across the community...looks like there might be something in it, having seen the note from WPLACHY who has collected a few more - thanks for that!! John
----------------------------------------PS They were both nl WU's...... [Edit 1 times, last edit by JSYKES at Jun 4, 2010 9:07:32 PM] |
||
|
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3715 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
So far have an absolute 100% validation score on W7-32 bit on duo and Linux 64 bit with 6.10 64 bit client on quad in any imaginable WCG science combination. Running HPF2 in combo with HFCC & FAAH on W7-64 quad did give errors for a considerable fail percent, but none with HCC/RICE/HCMD2. Since I read these HPF2 |
||
|
|
JSYKES
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 200 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Given the very wide use of Windows compared to other OS's, the probability of seeing both errors and reporting of errors must be greater - although am I correct in believing that different clients are run on other OS's? If so, could there also be a client code issue to consider, not just the inevitable 'Microsoft' factor (not to mention 64 bit device drivers???) !!!!
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 13, 2009 Post Count: 1066 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I have seen it a couple of times too on Win7 64-bit (client_version>6.2.28<). I was running both cores on my E8400 though, and I am now down to a single core. I haven't seen it for the week since then, but we will see.
And I never see it on my WinXP machine running a quad-core, but that is to be expected I think. |
||
|
|
JSYKES
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 200 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Yes, I have not seen a repeat to date (having raised it as an issue!!) - I agree with you Jim, the i7 multi-core W7 64 boxes were the culprits in both instances - the 2-core box running XP Pro just chugs along and cranks out the WU's 24/7 without a hitch.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
JSYKES
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 200 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I have received another batch of errors over the last couple of days - this time on 'no_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' WU's - on one particular WU, there were 6 more error returns and still counting with repairs being sent out right, left and centre - same error msg again.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Plz post the whole Result log in which that line appeared, for context.
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
|