Thanks for the feedback

Hopefully the beta results will point to where this is going wrong

Sometimes failure can be a success in pre-production.

Dave

OK long last and 15 out of 16 valid, really running 4 cores for this test. Too good to be true?

BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0054_ 0-- android_fcbcf39
e Pending Verification 3/5/14 21:09:36 3/6/14 07:33:41 8.82 / 10.25 84.8 / 0.0
BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0059_ short_ 2-- android_fcbcf39
e Valid 3/6/14 19:01:19 3/6/14 21:11:55 1.52 / 2.12 17.5 / 18.9
BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0050_ short_ 1-- android_fcbcf39
e Valid 3/6/14 08:47:21 3/6/14 10:24:56 1.35 / 1.52 12.5 / 10.3
BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0086_ short_ 1-- android_fcbcf39
e Valid 3/6/14 08:39:32 3/6/14 09:56:33 1.04 / 1.15 9.5 / 9.0
BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0066_ short_ 0-- android_fcbcf39
e Valid 3/6/14 08:33:39 3/6/14 10:01:15 1.23 / 1.36 11.3 / 9.5
BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0031_ short_ 1-- android_fcbcf39
e Valid 3/6/14 08:07:28 3/6/14 08:53:53 0.57 / 0.63 5.2 / 4.3
BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0083_ short_ 0-- android_fcbcf39
e Valid 3/6/14 07:33:41 3/6/14 08:33:39 0.39 / 0.44 3.6 / 4.0
BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0052_ short_ 1-- android_fcbcf39
e Valid 3/6/14 07:19:57 3/6/14 08:07:28 0.50 / 0.54 4.5 / 3.7
BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0081_ short_ 1-- android_fcbcf39
e Valid 3/6/14 06:52:59 3/6/14 08:47:21 1.10 / 1.69 14.0 / 13.9
BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0055_ short_ 2-- android_fcbcf39
e Valid 3/6/14 06:50:50 3/6/14 07:19:57 0.45 / 0.48 4.0 / 4.0
BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0035_ short_ 0-- android_fcbcf39
e Valid 3/6/14 06:11:05 3/6/14 08:39:32 0.98 / 1.79 14.8 / 12.5
BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0079_ short_ 1-- android_fcbcf39
e Valid 3/6/14 05:52:57 3/6/14 06:52:59 0.85 / 0.91 7.5 / 5.9
BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0085_ short_ 1-- android_fcbcf39
e Valid 3/6/14 05:40:46 3/6/14 06:50:50 0.91 / 0.97 8.0 / 7.8
BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0009_ 1-- android_fcbcf39
e Valid 3/5/14 21:09:36 3/6/14 05:40:46 7.67 / 8.50 70.3 / 58.4
BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0014_ 1-- android_fcbcf39
e Valid 3/5/14 21:09:36 3/6/14 05:52:57 7.88 / 8.70 72.0 / 52.8
BETA_ FAHV_ x4GW6bINleB_ 0348262_ 0011_ 2-- android_fcbcf39
e Valid 3/5/14 21:09:36 3/6/14 06:11:05 7.82 / 8.99 74.4 / 54.6

The one that has the pending verification had no additional copies, just 2 before the 3rd was required by the validator. My device had multiple unplugs from the mains which is under the then running client and settings equal to unloading and reloading.

Oh and please could you fix the device manager and device statistics to include the suffix so we know which device we're dealing with. The result status page is fine and shows the same name-truncated mac code at all other projects too.

9 out of 10 valid. 1 errored on the device and I have one pending verification

For me a great result all 4 cores running at the time.

But my wingmen and women haven't faired so well

But still it's progress :-)

Do you have an ETA for a second beta test? (understanding there's work in debugging behind the scenes)

Dave

Given the ungodly error rate at present of 6.7 copies for 1 valid to pass to the scientists, and I say 1 because this is a zero redundancy science for all we know, anything that approaches 15 of 16 or 9 of 10 valid should be moved forthwith into production. Here it is assumed the identical validator is used on the beta versus the production version. If you've got lots to learn, pick up the swift update method as is done for the agent. Buy yourself some time and credit for continuing like this is a near insulting.

I'm with Lavaflow and Falconet on that suggestion

It would be worth returning for with the hope of 10 out of 10 in the near future.

Currently it's pointless in every sense