Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 603
Posts: 603   Pages: 61   [ Previous Page | 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 832096 times and has 602 replies Next Thread
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2006
Post Count: 1585
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: News from the Crunching Field

You'll do fine. If you're getting parents for 2233-2240 they must be re-sends as the 2244 were going out a couple days ago. Expect the parents (225x) to stop shortly and we'll see a bunch of children/grandchildren for the next couple days or more.
----------------------------------------

Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000
[Dec 30, 2011 6:04:39 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: News from the Crunching Field

My most recent downloads are:
    parents for 2253, 2255
    children for 2202, 2237, 2239, 2240.
The most recent grandchildren were yesterday, for 2198, 2201.
The 225x parents are certainly a jump ahead in batch number compared with the recent trend. Let's hope it's not a new trend! But as you say, KWSN, parents and children don't seem to be evenly spread, you can have a whole day or two with only one or the other appearing, if a single user's downloads for several cores spread across 24 hours can be taken as representative.
[Dec 30, 2011 8:13:58 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
martin64
Senior Cruncher
Germany
Joined: May 11, 2009
Post Count: 445
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: News from the Crunching Field

10 days ago, KWSN - A Shrubbery reported #2207 parents being sent out. I received a #2257 right now, so it's 50 positions within 10 days, 5 per day. 210 left, so that's 42 days at current pace for all the parents. Don't forget that there will be children and grandchildren WUs for quite some time after the last parent WU has been sent out.

Regards,
Martin
----------------------------------------

[Dec 30, 2011 10:20:02 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: News from the Crunching Field

And in the past 2 hours I have received parents for batch numbers 2260, 2261 and 2262. Is this a temporary or a "permanent" increase in the throughput, I wonder worried
[Dec 30, 2011 3:09:19 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2006
Post Count: 1585
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: News from the Crunching Field

I've gotten several 2263 now. My new hypothesis is that they're just trying to make all our predictions and estimates look bad.

In other words... the techs are purposely messing with us.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
----------------------------------------

Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000
[Dec 30, 2011 6:21:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: News from the Crunching Field

If you look at the batch charts from the researchers you will see that all of the batches have different numbers of positions to calculate. These later batches are all much smaller than many of the batches up through say 1700.

I have closely watched this from the beginning due to high interest and fully expect these latter batch numbers to go much more quickly than predecessors.
[Dec 30, 2011 6:42:03 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: News from the Crunching Field

@KWSN - A Shrubbery
I've gotten several 2263 now. My new hypothesis is that they're just trying to make all our predictions and estimates look bad
Of course biggrin. Just to prove you're right, I've downloaded nothing except grandchildren WUs since your post, with batch numbers ranging from 2201 to 2233.
@doug_sanchez
These later batches are all much smaller than many of the batches up through say 1700
I'm not sure that the batch size explains why the parent batches yesterday and today progressed so rapidly compared with those from the month up to now, since say batch 2107. It would be nice to have a table with the numbers of positions to calculate, not just the chart.
[Dec 30, 2011 7:35:46 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor
Normandy - France
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Post Count: 3715
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: News from the Crunching Field

After a looonng series of parents (as reported above) children and grand-children have been coming back yesterday evening.

Highest batch numbers to-date here:
- parents: Reported: 2263
- children: In Process: 2237
- grand-children: In Process: 2232

Oldest grand-child still In Process: 2187
----------------------------------------
Team--> Decrypthon -->Statistics/Join -->Thread
[Dec 31, 2011 1:20:05 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor
Normandy - France
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Post Count: 3715
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: News from the Crunching Field

I've gotten several 2263 now. My new hypothesis is that they're just trying to make all our predictions and estimates look bad.
I think they were only catching up and preparing material for later child and grand-child WUs.

Between my latest report above and the previous one there have been 15 days and (according to them) the progress is as follows:
- parents: 69 batch numbers, or 4.6 batch numbers/day
- children: 51 batch numbers, or 3.4 batch numbers/day
- grand-children: 57 batch numbers, or 3.8 batch numbers/day
- oldest grand-children in process: 68 batch numbers, or 4.5 batch numbers/day.

So, the rough estimate of 5 batches per day is still conservative (from a badge hunting viewpoint smile ) and using it that gives at least:
- 41 days until receiving parents for batch 2467
- 46 days until receiving children for batch 2467
- 47 days until receiving grand-children for batch 2467
- and probably 56 days for clearing everything.

And as a matter of fact, that matches SekeRob's estimate. smile

Also, remember that the techs are usually posting a warning about 30 days before their estimated end of distribution.

@doug sanchez
It would be nice to have a table with the numbers of positions to calculate, not just the chart.
The chart allows you to estimate the number of positions rather closely, particularly precisely enough if you remember that the number of positions is a weak information, knowing that the CPU time needed to compute one position is extremely variable.
----------------------------------------
Team--> Decrypthon -->Statistics/Join -->Thread
[Dec 31, 2011 2:08:41 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: News from the Crunching Field

Jim,

Thanks for the updated estimates!

Clearly my response to the query/statement was EXTREMELY general. I am plenty comfortable in viewing the chart for rough estimates on expected progression.
[Dec 31, 2011 4:53:50 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 603   Pages: 61   [ Previous Page | 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread